<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who wins when On-Page SEO goes head-to-head with Off-Page SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradleyspencer.com/2008/on-page-or-off-page-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradleyspencer.com/2008/on-page-or-off-page-seo/</link>
	<description>Building traffic and driving sales for Small Business and Bloggers since 2003.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleyspencer.com/2008/on-page-or-off-page-seo/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleyspencer.com/archives/111#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>I must admit that I prefer the second fan group, namely Off-Page Enthusiasts. Probably the reason is the flood of pro link building arguments that poor into the community these days. Some go as far as estimating that off page opt. weights approximately 90% of Google&#039;s algorithm for ranking. And if you consider that rankings are largely built on popularity and authority, a.k.a. link building 100%, they&#039;re right... 

Still, onpage can count heavily if you work smart with your site and don&#039;t rely solely on isolated measures like fix title tag, then fix meta description and so on. 

It&#039;s something more about on page and it deals with Silo Structuring your Website. Here&#039;s an article where I try to re establish onpage optimization as a dependable part of SEO that could even absolve you from building a good amount of back links in order to rank properly:
http://trafficcpanel.com/820/silo-structure-seo-method-that-lifts-the-pressure-off-link-building/ 

Hope you find it useful!
Cheers, 
Cristian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit that I prefer the second fan group, namely Off-Page Enthusiasts. Probably the reason is the flood of pro link building arguments that poor into the community these days. Some go as far as estimating that off page opt. weights approximately 90% of Google&#8217;s algorithm for ranking. And if you consider that rankings are largely built on popularity and authority, a.k.a. link building 100%, they&#8217;re right&#8230; </p>
<p>Still, onpage can count heavily if you work smart with your site and don&#8217;t rely solely on isolated measures like fix title tag, then fix meta description and so on. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s something more about on page and it deals with Silo Structuring your Website. Here&#8217;s an article where I try to re establish onpage optimization as a dependable part of SEO that could even absolve you from building a good amount of back links in order to rank properly:<br />
<a href="http://trafficcpanel.com/820/silo-structure-seo-method-that-lifts-the-pressure-off-link-building/" rel="nofollow">http://trafficcpanel.com/820/silo-structure-seo-method-that-lifts-the-pressure-off-link-building/</a> </p>
<p>Hope you find it useful!<br />
Cheers,<br />
Cristian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/12 queries in 0.224 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: bradleyspencer.com @ 2012-02-08 06:49:44 -->
