Comments on: Got an Ugly WooRank? So does Google, Ebay, and Facebook.

By: Facebook Trick

Facebook Trick — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:41:00 +0000

exactly woorank algorithms are stupid

By: Vincent Battaglia

Vincent Battaglia — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:01:00 +0000

Dear Sergey. I’m not ashamed because WooRank has helped a lot of people to detect SEO errors and resolve them. Don’t focus on the score, it’s not the WooRank point. It’s just to have an idea. Advices are the most important thing.

By: Sergey

Sergey — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:43:00 +0000

Quite honestly your reports are a crock. How you have the audacity to come and say “yesterday was 56.7 and today is 58.4″ when the whole thing is a heap of bull anyway I really don’t know.

Nobody cares about DMOz or Compete or half of the Carp/Goldfish info you are using to rank things it is nonsense. You should be ashamed of being source for all the SEO con merchants giving SEO a bad name IMHO

By: Cinderella

Cinderella — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:02:36 +0000

I just noticed a ranking from woorank and wondered how they get their information. I usually don’t mind rankings because I am a new website and obviously learning and growing but this time they put the wrong location. They had me in Arizona( I am not) they put I had no sitemap.xml and I do and many other things just not accurate. I really don’t get the point of rankings, especially inaccurate ones. I agree with Carter Cole with the fix it analogy.

By: Jim

Jim — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:30:51 +0000

We get 4-5K visitors but are doing a lousy job selling the items on the right border.

By: William

William — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:29:42 +0000

my site value are dynamic at woorank ,sometimes 4,xx but in the next hours,it changes to 3,xx ….and then its change again.
weird..or there is something wrong with my site.

By: tom james

tom james — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:37:51 +0000

Scoring 44.0 on a brand new, think myself thats a decent starting point.

By: eng. Ilian Iliev

eng. Ilian Iliev — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:19:00 +0000

Hi Bradley,

you must have in mind that sites like Ebay, Facebook etc. does not need a great rank. They already have millions of users. Most of them attracted with some marketing and other tricks, but they already have these users, and evryone has heard of them, so if they continue to provide them with good content their rank will have no value.

By: Carter Cole

Carter Cole — Sat, 22 May 2010 07:08:37 +0000

mine got a 39.4 i saw it and didnt give it much thought most automated analysis is very inaccurate and reports problems so they can "fix it"... awesome work showing how the big names get bad scores too

By: anon-i-mouse

anon-i-mouse — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:34:02 +0000

got an 80.5 but gzip appears to be incorrectly reported for our domain. not sure why, but after checking out a few other uk universities it appears we all have no whois registrant info. not sure if that’s the cause, but doing a fiddler lookup of our site, and checking cache box settings reveals we definately ARE using gzip compression.

tried getting in touch with woorank a few times but they’ve just appeared to ignore the bug.